Skip to main content

Contemporary Treatment and Outcomes of High Surgical Risk Mitral Regurgitation.

Journal of clinical medicine

Authors: Mitsumasa Sudo, Vivian Vij, Nihal Wilde, Tetsu Tanaka, Johanna Vogelhuber, Miriam Silaschi, Marcel Weber, Farhad Bakhtiary, Georg Nickenig, Sebastian Zimmer, Atsushi Sugiura

Before the development of transcatheter interventions, patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) and high surgical risk were often conservatively treated and subject to poor prognoses. We aimed to assess the therapeutic approaches and outcomes in the contemporary era. The study participants were consecutive high-risk MR patients from April 2019 to October 2021. Among the 305 patients analyzed, 274 (89.8%) underwent mitral valve interventions, whereas 31 (10.2%) received medical therapy alone. Of the interventions, transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral repair (TEER) was the most frequent (82.0% of overall), followed by transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) (4.6%). In patients treated with medical therapy alone, non-optimal morphologies for TEER and TMVR were shown in 87.1% and 65.0%, respectively. Patients undergoing mitral valve interventions experienced less frequent heart failure (HF) rehospitalization compared to those with medical therapy alone (18.2% vs. 42.0%, < 0.01). Mitral valve intervention was associated with a lower risk of HF rehospitalization (HR 0.36 [0.18-0.74]) and an improved New York Heart Association class ( < 0.01). Most high-risk MR patients can be treated with mitral valve interventions. However, approximately 10% remained on medical therapy alone and were considered as unsuitable for current transcatheter technologies. Mitral valve intervention was associated with a lower risk of HF rehospitalization and improved functional status.

PMID: 37109312

Participating cluster members