Skip to main content

Do GWAS-Identified Risk Variants for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Influence Overall Patient Survival and Disease Progression?

International journal of molecular sciences

Authors: Antonio José Cabrera-Serrano, José Manuel Sánchez-Maldonado, Rob Ter Horst, Angelica Macauda, Paloma García-Martín, Yolanda Benavente, Stefano Landi, Alyssa Clay-Gilmour, Yasmeen Niazi, Blanca Espinet, Juan José Rodríguez-Sevilla, Eva María Pérez, Rossana Maffei, Gonzalo Blanco, Matteo Giaccherini, James R Cerhan, Roberto Marasca, Miguel Ángel López-Nevot, Tzu Chen-Liang, Hauke Thomsen, Irene Gámez, Daniele Campa, Víctor Moreno, Silvia de Sanjosé, Rafael Marcos-Gragera, María García-Álvarez, Trinidad Dierssen-Sotos, Andrés Jerez, Aleksandra Butrym, Aaron D Norman, Mario Luppi, Susan L Slager, Kari Hemminki, Yang Li, Sonja I Berndt, Delphine Casabonne, Miguel Alcoceba, Anna Puiggros, Mihai G Netea, Asta Försti, Federico Canzian, Juan Sainz

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common leukemia among adults worldwide. Although genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have uncovered the germline genetic component underlying CLL susceptibility, the potential use of GWAS-identified risk variants to predict disease progression and patient survival remains unexplored. Here, we evaluated whether 41 GWAS-identified risk variants for CLL could influence overall survival (OS) and disease progression, defined as time to first treatment (TTFT) in a cohort of 1039 CLL cases ascertained through the CRuCIAL consortium. Although this is the largest study assessing the effect of GWAS-identified susceptibility variants for CLL on OS, we only found a weak association of ten single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with OS ( < 0.05) that did not remain significant after correction for multiple testing. In line with these results, polygenic risk scores (PRSs) built with these SNPs in the CRuCIAL cohort showed a modest association with OS and a low capacity to predict patient survival, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.57. Similarly, seven SNPs were associated with TTFT ( < 0.05); however, these did not reach the multiple testing significance threshold, and the meta-analysis with previous published data did not confirm any of the associations. As expected, PRSs built with these SNPs showed reduced accuracy in prediction of disease progression (AUROC = 0.62). These results suggest that susceptibility variants for CLL do not impact overall survival and disease progression in CLL patients.

PMID: 37175717

Participating cluster members